Finally, the 330 year after they were introduced, wig began to disappear from our courts. This was just announced that the lawyer is not going to wear a wig, or cloak, the Supreme Court, the country's highest court. They will continue to take place in the lower courts, but here's hoping they can count on there, too.
The defenders tried to maintain that the wig that produces beautiful courts, anonymity so the jury does not support one another lawyer. Well, if that's true, why aren't they insist standard issue clothing for all lawyers, both men and women alike; or even go a step further and ask them to wear face masks? And, if You really want people to cover their heads, you may ask lawyers to wear a hat, rather than a wig dating back to 1680, when they are worn as a matter of course by lawyers and non-lawyers.
Those who defend the wig that was always the kind of person who wants to hold on to what has already been immortalized by using long. I usually belonged to the brigade and, I am sure, will have to defend a wig if I never had to wear one. This is not a question interesting modernity, or the 21st century; This is a question of getting rid of the ridiculous and very uncomfortable.
If you are going to set up a new court system in a new country, what mad fantasy will advise that the representatives of the law should be put on the aging, yellowed, thick matted hairs of horses in their heads?